Course Schedule of Philosophy

I will answer my cell ph adept just now after 4 pm. If you be unable to r individually me please forego a message that includes a brief description of your question or concern, and I will return your call as soon as possible (but always within 24 hours). I Welcome I came to education as an adult learner having stock an associate full stop from MATCH when I was 30. I graduated from Marquette University 4 years ulterior with degrees in education, writing and English. Then 4 years later I earned master degrees in education and computer technology from primordial Stretch University. Currently I am working on my doctors degree in education. line of descent Description This five- calendar hebdomad course in critical thought process and unaffixed logic helps students develop the ability to reason cl earlyish and critically. It includes an introduction to the disciplines of inducive and deductive logic, fallacious reasoning, and problem- solving techniques. Emphasis is placed on the naming and management of the perception process, use of assumptions, emotional influences, and language in mixed forms of business communication. Topics and Objectives decisive Thinking Purpose and Process Define thinking. draw the critical thinking process.Relate the stages of cognitive development to logic and critical thinking. The human relationship of logic to critical thinking. The Perception Process and its Influences Outline the perceptual process. apologise Describe perceptual blocks to clear and critical thinking personal barriers, sensing, and physiology. Assumptions unfavorable Thinking and the Unknown Recognize assumptions in various situations. Compare and rail line necessary and unwarranted assumptions. Develop methods of checking assumptions and creating alternatives. Logic versus Emotion Define the utilization of emotion in reasoning and argument. call down the impact of emotional influence on personal and professional effectiveness. let off the impact of feelings on the critical thinking process. Analysis of the Use of Language in Thinking and public debate Explain the role of language in the critical thinking process. Identify the creator and limitations of language in expressing thoughts. Explore the impact of language diversity. Elements and Composition of Argument Explore the role of critical thinking in persuasion. Distinguish arguments from nourishment. Identify the bulges of an argument and their relationship to each other. Describe the role of likeness in argument. Identify the methods used in organizing thoughts. Differentiate between inducive and deductive modalities of reasoning. Explore the structure and use of syllogisms in reasoning. Define the concepts of truth, validity, and resolution in a deductive argument. Patterns of Fallacious Reasoning Apply hold out rational reasoning to problem solving. Recognize fallacies in written, oral, and visual arguments. Critical Thinking Techniques Synthesize understanding of fallacies in reasoning and argument. Develop free oral arguments.IW51101 *For on-ground students, these are oral and emailprotected presentations with notes. 1 101 Total 11001 Course Changes Please note that the instructors assignments may vary from the sure syllabus you received from the student web page. Assignments in this document take priority. While the study assignments and education objectives remain the same, some of the assignments in this syllabus fork up been customized for this particular(a) section. *** The instructor reserves the right to change this document wily cipher as he sees fit *** Policies and ProceduresThe University trusts each student to maintain racy standards of h angiotensin converting enzymesty, academic integrity, and ethical behavior. All individual assignments MUST reflect each students own original effort. During the course students must achieve specified skill outcomes in order to meet the course objectives. Your assignment labels will b e dependent on the accomplishment of those objectives. All assignments are evaluated on the rump of achievement, and not on effort. University of Phoenix Grading Guidelines can be lay down in your Program Handbook.A student who meets course objectives will earn a cast of C. In order to earn a level of A or B the student assignments. Unless otherwise specified, all written document are to be typewritten, double-spaced, and proofread and corrected for grammatical, spelling, and typographical errors. Source material must be cited within the body of the paper and referenced at the end of the paper. All references must be cited within the body of the paper. The change for all typewritten work follows the standards in The Little, Brown Compact Handbook (Custom quaternate De. University of Phoenix). All written assignments will be evaluated as specified in the Grading Criteria for Written Assignments found at the end of this syllabus and on my instructors web page. Attendance and pa rticipation Attendance at each shop class is mandatory In this five week course only one unavoidable absence will be permitted, and you must notify one of the instructors in advance. Should an absence occur the student is responsible for all assignment(s) receivable in that workshop.Points for classroom participation are dependent on your heading in the classroom for the entire workshop If you are absent for any reason participation points for that workshop will be deducted from your grade. Arriving more than than 15 minutes late for class or leaving class early will also result in point deductions each item will be evaluated individually. If you must be unavoidably absent for the learning team presentation it must reflect your involvement (by audio or video tape) in order for you to share in the grade for that assignment.Learning teams symbolize an important part in achieving the educational outcomes in the degree programs at University of Phoenix. Teams will be formed in th e first workshop of the course, and students are expected to commit to five hours of learning team activities each week in addition to attendance at the workshops. Through the process of completing team charters and meeting logs, and participating in classroom discussions, students will have the opportunity to reflect on the learning that has takes place as part of the teams work together.The learning team presentation in Workshop fivesome will be evaluated on the basis of content (10 points) and presentation direction (10 points). If you have questions regarding what is determined by style it is up to you to request this entropy from your instructor. All learning team members will receive the same grade for the reservation, regardless of individual style differences. Late assignments It is assumed that students will discharge professionally in preparing work required for this class.All assignments must be submitted on their due date. Assignments will be accepted up to one week late but that will result in an automatic grade reduction of 10% of the total possible points for that assignment. I will not accept assignments ahead of time). Incomplete Incomplete will only be considered on an individual basis. Academic Honesty Academic honesty is passing valued at the University of Phoenix. You must always vomit work that represents your original words or ideas.If any words or ideas used in a class posting or assignment submission do not represent your original words or ideas, you must cite all relevant sources and make clear the extent to which much(prenominal) sources were used. rowing or ideas that require citation include, but are not control to, all hard copy or electronic publications, whether copyrighted or not, and all verbal or visual communication when the content of such communication clearly originates from an identifiable source. Please see the I-JOB Catalog for more training about academic honesty, including consequences of academic dishonest y.Privacy and Confidentiality in the Online Classroom unmatchable of the highlights of the I-JOB academic experience is that students can draw on the wealth of examples from their organizations in class discussions and in their written work. However, it is imperative that students not share information that is confidential, privileged, or proprietary in nature.