Ethic Comments Essay

In the first coif to mind 1 the writer makes the binding state custodyt about her relationship with paragon. I can evaluate to do things on my own but if it is not in his design it will not happen Winkelmann (1). This seems to indicate that the writer believes that only kneads that follow Gods plan will have successful results. How does one know if an motion that one is about to commit is in Gods plan? If God does have a plan for apiece of us, be we capable of committing an act that is not in Gods plan?The second writer to answer disbelief 1 describes the swear out he uses to make important decisions in his life. He declares that, I usually evaluate to go in the path of whichever solution has less consequences, and to try to do what is morally beneficial Tango (1). It is unclear whether the writer is reflection that only acts with little or no consequences are moral or, if the act that produces the least number of bad consequences is the most moral. What makes the wr iter believe the consequences of an act determine its moral correctness?In answer 1 to inquire 2 the writer suggest that Psychologist Carol Gilligan believes that women and men should learn to recall both views of ethical motive to get a better understanding so that women could recognize their own human rights and not be considered inferior to men (2). While the equating of men and women may be an ethical goal, is the equality of men and women a goal of ethics? In response to question 2, writer 2 makes the following quote about ethics. The task of ethics is to respond to respond to particular individuals with whom we have valuable and close relationships (2).An employer could be showing compassion and concern for his/her employees yet, the employer could be over charging his customers for inferior products or services. Does showing compassion, concern, love, or kindness in close relationships have anything to do with the moral correctness of the people in those relationships? Th e first answer to question 3 supposes that people have an innate sense of what is right and wrong. Someplace, in our minds we know what is right or wrong (3). This statement seems incorrect to this writer. altogether children commit wrong actions. How will a child learn which actions are right and which actions are wrong, if he is not taught? The writer of the second answer to question 3 states Conscience itself is usually described as the knowledgeable sense of what is right or wrong in ones conduct or motives impelling one toward right action (3). I agree with this writer that a conscience need not come from religion. If this consciousness of right and wrong does not come from religion, from where does it come?